Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Try to fix amount of connecitons #570

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Dec 5, 2024
Merged

Try to fix amount of connecitons #570

merged 4 commits into from
Dec 5, 2024

Conversation

kongzii
Copy link
Contributor

@kongzii kongzii commented Dec 5, 2024

deploy please

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 5, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve modifications to the DBManager class located in db_manager.py. The primary alteration is the adjustment of the pool_size parameter in the create_engine method from 10 to 2, which impacts connection pooling. Additionally, the create_tables method has been updated for clarity, including a new comment and changes to how the tables_to_create variable is initialized. These adjustments enhance the control flow of the table creation process and improve database connection management.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
prediction_market_agent_tooling/tools/db/db_manager.py - Updated pool_size parameter in create_engine method from 10 to 2.
- Added comment in create_tables method for clarity.
- Modified logic in create_tables to initialize tables_to_create as None when sqlmodel_tables is not provided and updated cache after table creation.

Possibly related PRs

  • DB Manager <> db_cache fix attempt #567: The changes in the DBManager class regarding the create_tables method and connection management are closely related, as both PRs modify the same method and address connection pooling behavior.

Suggested reviewers

  • gabrielfior

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a90a189 and 6b70e68.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • prediction_market_agent_tooling/tools/db/db_manager.py (3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • prediction_market_agent_tooling/tools/db/db_manager.py

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
prediction_market_agent_tooling/tools/db/db_manager.py (1)

Add error handling and consider database connection reliability

The codebase shows that error handling is consistently used in other database-related operations, but is missing in the table creation logic. Additionally, the current implementation relies on an in-memory cache that could lead to reliability issues.

Consider this safer implementation:

def create_tables(self, sqlmodel_tables: Sequence[type[SQLModel]] | None = None) -> None:
    try:
        with self.get_connection() as connection:
            if sqlmodel_tables is not None:
                tables_to_create = []
                for sqlmodel_table in sqlmodel_tables:
                    table_name = (
                        sqlmodel_table.__tablename__()
                        if callable(sqlmodel_table.__tablename__)
                        else sqlmodel_table.__tablename__
                    )
                    # Check if table exists directly in database
                    inspector = connection.dialect.inspector
                    if not inspector.has_table(table_name):
                        tables_to_create.append(
                            SQLModel.metadata.tables[table_name]
                        )
            else:
                tables_to_create = None

            SQLModel.metadata.create_all(connection, tables=tables_to_create)
            connection.commit()
    except Exception as e:
        raise RuntimeError(f"Failed to create database tables: {str(e)}") from e

Key improvements:

  • Added proper error handling for database operations
  • Removed unreliable in-memory cache in favor of direct table existence checks
  • Simplified the code flow and reduced potential race conditions
  • Uses database inspector for reliable table existence checks
🔗 Analysis chain

Line range hint 55-77: Add error handling and address potential race conditions

The current implementation has several potential issues:

  1. No error handling for table creation failures
  2. Cache persistence isn't guaranteed across process restarts
  3. Possible race conditions in concurrent scenarios
  4. Cache might mask actual database connectivity issues

Let's verify if there are any error handling patterns in the codebase:

Consider this safer implementation:

     def create_tables(
         self, sqlmodel_tables: Sequence[type[SQLModel]] | None = None
     ) -> None:
+        try:
             # Determine tables to create
             if sqlmodel_tables is not None:
                 tables_to_create = []
                 for sqlmodel_table in sqlmodel_tables:
                     table_name = (
                         sqlmodel_table.__tablename__()
                         if callable(sqlmodel_table.__tablename__)
                         else sqlmodel_table.__tablename__
                     )
                     table = SQLModel.metadata.tables[table_name]
-                    if not self.cache_table_initialized.get(table.name):
+                    # Verify table existence directly with database
+                    with self.get_connection() as connection:
+                        if not connection.dialect.has_table(connection, table_name):
                             tables_to_create.append(table)
             else:
                 tables_to_create = None

             # Create tables in the database
             with self.get_connection() as connection:
                 SQLModel.metadata.create_all(connection, tables=tables_to_create)
                 connection.commit()

-            # Update cache to mark tables as initialized
-            if tables_to_create:
-                for table in tables_to_create:
-                    self.cache_table_initialized[table.name] = True
+        except Exception as e:
+            raise RuntimeError(f"Failed to create tables: {str(e)}") from e
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for error handling patterns in database operations
rg -A 3 "try:|except:|finally:" prediction_market_agent_tooling/tools/db/

Length of output: 75


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's first check if the directory exists and list its contents
ls -R prediction_market_agent_tooling/tools/db/

# Then search for any database-related error handling in the entire codebase
rg -A 3 "try:|except:|finally:" --type python

# Let's also check for any database connection patterns
rg -A 3 "get_connection|create_tables" --type python

Length of output: 271


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for error handling patterns without file type restriction
rg -A 3 "try:|except:|finally:" prediction_market_agent_tooling/

# Check for database connection and table creation patterns
rg -A 3 "get_connection|create_tables" prediction_market_agent_tooling/

# Look for any SQLModel usage patterns
rg -A 3 "SQLModel" prediction_market_agent_tooling/

Length of output: 13502

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between beacb48 and 79d3d34.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • prediction_market_agent_tooling/tools/db/db_manager.py (2 hunks)

Comment on lines 36 to 39
pool_size=1,
pool_recycle=3600,
echo=True,
)
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Reconsider the drastic reduction in pool_size and debug logging

  1. Reducing pool_size to 1 eliminates concurrent database operations and may cause performance bottlenecks. Consider:

    • Using a size based on your concurrent operation needs (typically 5-10)
    • Implementing connection timeouts
    • Adding error handling for connection issues
  2. echo=True enables SQLAlchemy debug logging which may impact performance in production.

Consider this alternative configuration:

-    pool_size=1,
-    pool_recycle=3600,
-    echo=True,
+    pool_size=5,  # Adjust based on concurrent operation needs
+    pool_recycle=3600,
+    pool_timeout=30,  # Add timeout for connection acquisition
+    pool_pre_ping=True,  # Verify connections before using them
+    echo=False,  # Disable debug logging in production
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
pool_size=1,
pool_recycle=3600,
echo=True,
)
pool_size=5, # Adjust based on concurrent operation needs
pool_recycle=3600,
pool_timeout=30, # Add timeout for connection acquisition
pool_pre_ping=True, # Verify connections before using them
echo=False, # Disable debug logging in production
)

@@ -28,16 +28,17 @@ def __new__(cls, api_keys: APIKeys | None = None) -> "DBManager":
return cls._instances[url_hash]

def __init__(self, api_keys: APIKeys | None = None) -> None:
if hasattr(self, "_initialized"):
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's not clear to me why self._initialized = True is needed.
I expected DBManager to be a singleton, if that's the case, then this shouldn't be necessary.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Well, my words exactly!

I asked o1-preview to fix whatever is wrong with DBManager, and these changes are what it did. And now it seems it works 🤷

Screenshot by Dropbox Capture

@kongzii kongzii merged commit c6e10fa into main Dec 5, 2024
16 checks passed
@kongzii kongzii deleted the peter/poolsize branch December 5, 2024 13:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants